Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Basecamp Hospitality faces backlash over liquor license application

July 02, 2024 | Teton County, Wyoming



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Basecamp Hospitality faces backlash over liquor license application
In a recent government meeting, the Teton County Commission discussed an application for a new malt beverage permit submitted by Basecamp Hospitality LLC, operating as Tama Jackson Hole. The application, which was certified complete by the Wyoming Liquor Division, aims to enhance guest experiences by allowing alcohol consumption on-site, potentially reducing traffic on Moose Wilson Road.

John Hook, a representative from Basecamp, emphasized the benefits of the permit, stating it would improve the overall guest experience. However, the discussion took a serious turn during public comments when Jared Smith, a local resident and wildfire ambassador, raised significant safety concerns regarding the facility.

Smith urged the commission to deny the permit, citing Basecamp's failure to fulfill previous commitments related to safety and occupancy requirements. He highlighted the risks associated with the facility's design, particularly the absence of a sprinkler system in the plastic units, which could pose a fire hazard, especially if guests consume alcohol. Smith's comments underscored the potential dangers not only to guests but also to nearby residents and the environment.

The commission did not pose any questions to the applicant during the meeting, and the public comment period revealed a clear divide between the interests of the business and community safety concerns. The outcome of the permit application remains uncertain as the commission weighs the benefits against the potential risks highlighted by local stakeholders.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting