In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the implications of a proposed lodging tax and the importance of a countywide tax structure. The mayor emphasized that while the lodging tax is a consideration, the primary focus should be on the Strategic Planning and Allocation Taskforce (SPAT) and the benefits of a countywide tax. He argued that a countywide tax would generate more revenue to meet community needs compared to a town-only tax, which he believes should only be considered after fully exploring countywide options.

The conversation also touched on the contentious issue of revenue splits between the town and county, with a proposed 65-35 split being a focal point of debate. Some officials expressed concern that the specific split may be less significant than the overall revenue each entity can generate and the budgetary needs that arise. One commissioner pointed out that if the entities cannot agree on the split, it could lead to a detrimental situation for the community, emphasizing the need for collaboration over division.

Legal counsel provided clarification on the lodging tax, noting that the town cannot implement a town-only lodging tax while a countywide tax is in place. This led to discussions about potentially repealing the existing county tax to allow for a town-specific tax, although this option remains contentious.

Overall, the meeting highlighted the complexities of tax structures and revenue sharing between the town and county, with officials urging a focus on collaborative solutions to address the community's financial needs rather than getting bogged down in disputes over specific percentages.