During a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to a proposed bill aimed at temporarily eliminating design review processes for development projects. Heather Peel, representing Friends of the Market, emphasized the potential negative impact on the historic market and surrounding community. She argued that the absence of design review could lead to developments that obstruct natural light and views, fundamentally altering the character of the market area.

Peel highlighted the unique guidelines that currently protect the market, which differ from those applied to other historic districts. She expressed concern that without proper public notice and the ability to appeal decisions, significant changes could occur without community input, jeopardizing the market's integrity.

Edward Moore also spoke against the bill, criticizing the enthusiasm of developers who he felt were more interested in profit than community welfare. He referenced a specific case involving a proposed 19-story building that exceeded zoning limits, suggesting that a robust design review process is essential to ensure developments align with community standards and zoning laws.

Both speakers underscored the importance of maintaining a thorough design review process to protect the historical and cultural significance of the market area, urging decision-makers to reconsider the implications of the proposed legislation.