During a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding Resolution 24-69, which involves the potential use of eminent domain for private development. Several officials expressed their disapproval of the resolution, particularly due to its last-minute addition to the agenda without adequate legal analysis or the presence of legal counsel.

One commissioner voiced strong opposition to the use of eminent domain, emphasizing the importance of private negotiations between landowners and developers before any government intervention. They highlighted the complexities surrounding existing infrastructure, such as the gravity-fed sewer line and the capacity issues related to the development, which could complicate the situation further.

Another official echoed these sentiments, suggesting that the discussion should be tabled until proper due diligence is conducted. They argued that the board should not consider eminent domain until all private negotiation avenues have been exhausted. The need for a thorough legal review and a clear understanding of the implications of such a resolution was a recurring theme throughout the discussion.

Concerns were also raised about the potential financial benefits of the development, with some officials questioning whether the proposed changes would yield significant revenue for the town. They stressed the necessity of demonstrating substantial public benefit before moving forward with any plans that could involve taking private property.

Overall, the meeting underscored a cautious approach to eminent domain, with officials advocating for more comprehensive analysis and private negotiations before any decisions are made. The discussions reflect a broader concern about balancing development needs with the rights of property owners and the financial implications for the community.