In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding proposed noise regulation standards and setback requirements in Branson, Missouri. A local engineer, Philip J. Wentz of McClure Engineering, criticized specific lines in the ordinance, suggesting they should be completely removed due to their complexity and lack of alignment with established OSHA standards. Wentz described the current language as \"definitely not fair\" and \"technically not accurate,\" arguing that it confuses rather than clarifies noise testing protocols.

Wentz proposed a simplified replacement that would ensure compliance with OSHA regulations, which he referred to as the \"gold standard\" for safety and compliance. He emphasized that deviating from these national standards could expose the city to legal risks and complicate enforcement.

The discussion also highlighted a proposed increase in the setback requirement from 20 feet to 50 feet, which Wentz argued would not enhance public safety or welfare but instead serve as an unnecessary barrier to development. He questioned the rationale behind such restrictions, especially when existing ordinances already address visibility and noise concerns.

Additionally, Wentz challenged a provision that required primary structures to be built before the installation of temporary units, labeling it another hindrance to development without clear benefits to community safety.

Throughout the meeting, Wentz urged officials to consider the implications of overregulation on business growth and community development, advocating for clarity and adherence to recognized standards rather than convoluted and potentially unenforceable regulations.