Vetoed PFAS cleanup bill sparks community outrage and confusion

In a recent government meeting, significant discussions centered around environmental legislation and local infrastructure developments. One of the key topics was the controversial House Bill 1415, aimed at regulating PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) contamination in groundwater. The bill, which passed both the House and Senate with unanimous support, was unexpectedly vetoed by the governor. The veto was attributed to concerns from business associations regarding potential impacts on industry, despite the bill's intent to protect public health.

The meeting also highlighted a recent lawsuit that resulted in a $65 million settlement for New Hampshire against PFAS manufacturers. However, confusion arose regarding the state's role in the lawsuit, with clarifications indicating that the New Hampshire attorney general did not initiate the action. Instead, it was a national lawsuit led by a private law firm on behalf of water utilities facing remediation costs. The Merrimack Village District (MVD) was identified as eligible for approximately $4 million from this settlement, but complications arose when the attorney general's office informed the MVD that it could not apply for these funds independently.

Local officials expressed frustration over the state's handling of the situation, particularly given that the MVD had previously incurred significant expenses for PFAS remediation. The officials emphasized the need for transparency and support from the state to ensure that funds meant for remediation are allocated appropriately to the communities affected.

In addition to environmental issues, the meeting addressed local infrastructure, specifically the acceptance of a newly constructed 265-foot extension of Ash Lane. This extension, which includes a cul-de-sac and drainage easements, was completed to modern standards and opens up additional lots for development. The town manager reported on the ongoing efforts to finalize the acceptance of the road and the associated legal documentation.

Overall, the meeting underscored the ongoing challenges related to environmental regulation and community health, as well as the importance of local infrastructure development in supporting community growth.