In a recent government meeting, California lawmakers discussed two significant bills aimed at addressing emerging threats related to technology and gun safety.

The first bill, AB 1856, seeks to criminalize the creation and distribution of deepfake pornography without the consent of the individuals depicted. Assemblymember Todd highlighted the alarming rise of deepfake technology, which has been used to create realistic but fabricated sexual content, often targeting women. Since 2016, the number of deepfake pornography videos has surged, with over 143,000 new uploads reported in just the first three quarters of 2023. Proponents of the bill, including Mark Berkman from the Organization for Social Media Safety, argue that the legislation is essential to protect individuals from harassment and exploitation. However, opponents, including representatives from the ACLU, raised concerns about potential First Amendment violations and the bill's disproportionate impact on youth, warning that it could lead to criminal charges for sharing such content among peers.

The second bill, AB 3064, aims to enhance firearm safety by requiring manufacturers of safety devices to label their products with make and model information. This measure is intended to help consumers and law enforcement identify effective safety devices and ensure that recalled products are easily recognized. Supporters, including Deputy Attorney General Candace Chung, emphasized the importance of clear labeling for consumer safety, while opponents argued that the bill could create unnecessary burdens for manufacturers and law-abiding gun owners.

Additionally, AB 2917 was introduced to refine California's gun violence restraining order (GVRO) law, allowing courts to consider a broader range of factors when assessing threats of violence. This bill aims to strengthen protections for vulnerable communities, particularly in light of rising hate crimes. While supporters praised the bill as a necessary tool for preventing gun violence, critics expressed concerns about the potential for subjective interpretations of threats and the implications for individuals' rights.

As these bills progress through the legislative process, they highlight the ongoing challenges of balancing technological advancements and public safety with individual rights and freedoms.