In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around several after-the-fact variance requests related to property developments on Big Fish Lake. The meeting highlighted concerns over compliance with local zoning regulations, particularly regarding structures built without the necessary permits.

Mark Kramer, the property owner, presented his case for retaining a series of structures, including a garage and porch additions. He argued that the changes were necessary for personal reasons, particularly to accommodate his elderly parents who had difficulty using the cabin due to health issues. Kramer provided historical context, referencing changes in lake levels and erosion that have impacted property dimensions over the years. He also raised questions about the unusually high ordinary water level of Big Fish Lake compared to surrounding lakes, suggesting that this discrepancy complicates building regulations for property owners.

The board members expressed mixed sentiments regarding Kramer's explanations. While some acknowledged the challenges faced by seasonal property owners in navigating permit processes, others emphasized the importance of adhering to zoning laws to maintain the integrity of the lake environment. A complaint from a neighbor initiated the review of Kramer's structures, leading to scrutiny over whether the additions were compliant with local ordinances.

The board ultimately voted to deny the variance requests for the porch and screen additions, citing that they did not align with the general purposes of the shoreland regulations aimed at protecting the lake's ecological health. However, they approved the variance for a shed, recognizing its minimal impact on the surrounding area.

Community members, including neighbors and representatives from the Big Fish Lake Association, voiced their opinions during the meeting. While some supported Kramer's request, others stressed the need for strict adherence to regulations to prevent future complications and maintain the lake's character.

The meeting underscored the ongoing tension between property development and environmental stewardship in lakeshore communities, as well as the complexities faced by property owners in complying with local regulations.