During a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the potential relocation and preservation of a historic parsonage associated with Friendship Baptist Church. Members of the church community expressed their desire to move the building across the street to better utilize their campus, while also emphasizing the importance of preserving its historical integrity.

W. Flip Quill, chairman of the church's deacon board, highlighted the deep connections between the church and the parsonage, noting that many church members have historical ties to the building. He stated that the church is not seeking demolition but rather restoration and relocation to enhance its functionality.

James Gallman, a long-time church member, echoed these sentiments, explaining that the church has made significant investments in the building over the years but can no longer justify further expenditures due to its deteriorating condition. He urged the board to consider the move as a viable option for the church's future.

Concerns were raised regarding the building's landmark status, which currently protects its exterior but not necessarily its interior features. The board discussed the implications of moving the building, particularly how it might affect its eligibility for tax credits and preservation grants. It was noted that if the parsonage were relocated, the new owner could potentially apply for tax credits, which would bring the interior features under the board's purview.

The conversation also touched on the broader significance of the arts and crafts movement, with one speaker advocating for increased awareness and appreciation of this architectural style, particularly in the Southeast. The speaker offered to assist in organizing symposiums and presentations to highlight the historical value of the parsonage and its connection to the community.

As the meeting concluded, the board acknowledged the complexities surrounding the relocation and preservation of the parsonage, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of both the building's historical significance and the church's future needs. The discussions underscored the delicate balance between preserving heritage and adapting to contemporary community requirements.