Discovery disputes escalate as community demands swift resolution

In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the contentious ongoing litigation involving local defendants and the timeline for discovery proceedings. A suggestion was made to push the continued hearing date to October 23rd, following the conclusion of the discovery deadline. This proposal aims to provide all parties with a clearer understanding of the case based on the depositions and interrogatories that will be revealed by that time.

Grant Whitney, a resident and one of the defendants, expressed concerns about the board's reliance on statements made by fellow defendant, Mr. Panos, questioning the credibility of his claims due to his lack of firsthand involvement in the litigation. Whitney emphasized the importance of reviewing the public records related to the case, particularly the protective order filed by his family, which he argued was necessary due to inappropriate deposition questions posed by the plaintiffs.

Another resident, Howard Rose, urged the board to reconsider the timeline for discussions, advocating for a two-week extension rather than a longer delay. He criticized the ongoing litigation for prolonging the process and causing unnecessary strain on the community, suggesting that the applicants could have already moved forward with their project had they adhered to previous agreements.

Elizabeth Whitney echoed these sentiments, highlighting inaccuracies in Mr. Panos's statements and asserting that the litigation stems from a breach of a 2015 agreement made in good faith. She warned that the legal proceedings could extend for years, urging the board to protect the interests of the citizens involved.

Marnie Houlihan, representing both the planning board and as a private citizen, supported calls for a quicker resolution, emphasizing the need to address the concerns of residents who are waiting for alternatives to be considered.

The meeting underscored the community's frustration with the drawn-out litigation process and the desire for a more expedient resolution to the ongoing disputes.