In a recent government meeting, discussions centered on the future of greyhound racing and the implications of remote gambling on the industry. Lacey Anderson introduced Gary Teal from Grey 2K, a nonprofit organization advocating for the humane treatment of greyhounds. Teal highlighted concerns regarding the welfare of greyhounds in states like North Dakota and Oregon, where remote betting on greyhound races is permitted. He noted that greyhound racing is a declining industry, with only two tracks remaining in the U.S., both in West Virginia, and emphasized the high injury rates among racing dogs.

Teal presented data indicating that over 10,000 greyhounds were injured at tracks using Oregon's betting system, with many injuries occurring at foreign tracks. He argued that the current system lacks adequate animal welfare protections and called for a phase-out of greyhound betting in North Dakota, citing a poll where 71% of voters supported such a measure. He also raised concerns about connections between the North Dakota betting system and alleged cartel members involved in foreign dog racing.

The committee engaged in a robust debate, with some members questioning the broader implications of banning greyhound racing, including potential impacts on local economies and employment. Bruce Johnson from the North Dakota Racing Commission defended the industry, emphasizing the economic benefits and the enjoyment many derive from gambling. He expressed concern that banning greyhound racing could lead to significant job losses and negatively affect families reliant on the industry.

The meeting underscored a growing divide between animal welfare advocates and those who view greyhound racing as a legitimate source of entertainment and economic activity. As states across the country reconsider their stances on greyhound racing and remote betting, the outcome of these discussions could have lasting effects on both the industry and animal welfare policies.