During a recent city government meeting, community members expressed significant concerns regarding the proposed simultaneous demolition of two recreation centers, which they argue could disrupt essential services for families and children in Abilene. The discussions highlighted the potential savings of approximately $1 million from the demolition, but many speakers questioned the prioritization of cost-cutting over the well-being of the community.

Sammy Garcia, a vocal advocate, criticized the decision-making process, emphasizing that the city often finds funds for projects that benefit downtown development but hesitates to allocate resources for family services. He urged city officials to reconsider their approach, suggesting that if it costs an additional $1 million to maintain services for families during the demolition, the city should find a way to fund it.

Billy Enriquez, a local resident, proposed utilizing facilities at nearby schools to accommodate children displaced by the closures, ensuring that their needs are met without additional financial burden on families. He highlighted the importance of maintaining access to affordable childcare, particularly for children who rely on free or reduced lunch programs.

Erin Spence, a supervisor with child protective services, echoed these sentiments, stressing that the recreation centers provide vital care for approximately 400 children each summer. She urged the city to prioritize the safety and well-being of children in their decision-making, noting that many families depend on these centers for food and protection.

Justin Whitely, a former parks and recreation employee, added that local childcare providers lack the capacity to absorb the families that would be affected by the closures. He suggested exploring past successful partnerships with schools to mitigate the impact on the community.

The meeting underscored a growing concern among residents about the potential consequences of the recreation center closures, with calls for the city to prioritize family services and explore alternative solutions to ensure that children continue to receive the care they need.