During a recent city council meeting, discussions centered around the proposed $778,000 bid for a new dog park at Camp Barclay, which has raised concerns among council members regarding its high cost amid current financial constraints. The proposed park, located behind the new pet and adoption resource center, aims to enhance community amenities by including features such as mass grading, fencing, shade structures, lighting, restrooms, and dog washing stations.

Council members expressed skepticism about the project's price tag, with some suggesting a more basic version that could reduce costs significantly. One member proposed removing certain amenities, particularly the restroom, which is estimated to account for nearly half of the total cost. The absence of restrooms at the previous dog park had been mitigated by the proximity of the zoo, but the new location lacks similar facilities.

Concerns were voiced about the financial implications of proceeding with the project as planned, especially given the city's current economic environment. Several council members argued for a more fiscally responsible approach, suggesting that the project could be value-engineered to meet budgetary constraints while still fulfilling the community's need for a dog park.

Public comments echoed these sentiments, with residents expressing shock at the increased costs compared to earlier estimates and questioning the planning behind the project. Some suggested alternative solutions, such as allowing dog park users to access restrooms at the nearby adoption center.

In response to the concerns, city staff emphasized the importance of replacing the existing dog park to maintain community quality of life and noted that delaying the project could lead to even higher costs in the future due to inflation and rising construction prices. They highlighted that the funding for the project comes from a one-time capital fund, which cannot be used for ongoing expenses like salaries.

Ultimately, the council decided to table the proposal, directing staff to explore a streamlined version of the project with a target budget of approximately $500,000. This decision reflects a commitment to balancing community needs with fiscal responsibility, as council members seek to ensure that any new developments align with the city's financial capabilities.