During a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the proposal for a private airstrip intended for personal use by a local resident. The individual, who has had a passion for flying since the age of 20, expressed that after 45 years of hard work, he is finally able to pursue his dream of having an airstrip on his property.

The airstrip is planned to be grass-covered and will be situated nearly parallel to a nearby road, with the resident indicating that takeoffs and landings would typically occur into the wind. Concerns were raised by commissioners regarding the proximity of the airstrip to existing power lines and trees, with assurances given that the aircraft would be at a safe altitude of 1,200 to 1,400 feet when crossing the road.

Commissioners also sought clarification on the regulatory requirements for establishing the airstrip, including whether engineering plans were necessary. It was noted that while the county does not require engineering plans, there are state code requirements that may apply. The resident confirmed that he would adhere to conditions similar to those of other airstrips in the county, which include both grandfathered and registered airstrips.

A significant point of contention arose regarding the notification of adjacent property owners about the proposed airstrip. While the resident claimed to have notified several property owners, commissioners highlighted discrepancies in the list of adjacent owners, suggesting that a more comprehensive notification process may be necessary before proceeding to a public hearing.

The meeting underscored the complexities involved in establishing private airstrips, particularly concerning safety regulations and community notification, as local officials aim to balance personal aspirations with public safety and compliance.