During a recent government meeting, community concerns were raised regarding a proposed development project that has sparked significant opposition from local residents. Steve Mason, a resident living just a block away from the proposed site, voiced his strong objections, urging the committee to reject the project in favor of alternatives that would better serve the neighborhood.

Mason highlighted the rapid growth of the area, noting that 25 new homes have been added within a block in the past year alone. He emphasized the importance of adhering to existing guidelines, specifically calling for the denial of corner parking structures, which he argued do not align with the residential character of the neighborhood. He referenced a previous development, the Classen Curve, where promises made by the developer were not fulfilled, suggesting that a similar fate could befall the current proposal.

Mason proposed that if the project were to be approved, it should come with a temporary stipulation requiring the developers to adhere to their commitments within a two-year timeframe. This suggestion prompted a discussion among the committee members about the feasibility of imposing such time limits, with some uncertainty expressed regarding the existing regulations.

The meeting underscored the tension between development and community interests, as residents seek to maintain the integrity of their neighborhood amidst ongoing changes. The committee's deliberations on the proposal will continue, with the voices of concerned citizens like Mason playing a crucial role in shaping the outcome.