A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Homeowner Seeks Pool Variance After Family Tragedy

August 02, 2024 | Macomb, Macomb County, Michigan


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Homeowner Seeks Pool Variance After Family Tragedy
During a recent government meeting, the Board addressed several key issues, including a request for a variance related to pool placement and the status of sidewalk installations in residential areas.

The meeting began with a discussion about the potential installation of a sidewalk to address concerns raised by residents regarding accessibility. Mr. Mazar inquired whether obtaining a permit for a sidewalk could resolve existing issues, to which it was confirmed that while it would improve conditions, it would only partially address the problem due to space constraints caused by a bay window.

The Board then moved on to a more significant matter concerning a variance request for a pool installation at a property on Hidden Meadows Drive. The applicant, who was unable to attend due to a family emergency, sought permission to place a pool 7 feet from the principal structure instead of the required 10 feet. The request was prompted by the removal of trees that previously provided shade, leaving the homeowner with a less desirable backyard environment.

The Planning Department noted that the property has a 12-foot storm sewer easement that complicates the situation, as it restricts the usable space for the pool. Despite concerns about the lack of unique physical characteristics of the property, the Board acknowledged the practical difficulties posed by the easement.

After deliberation, the Board voted on the variance request. Mr. DeCoster made a motion to approve the variance based on the unique challenges presented by the easement, which was supported by Mr. Piper. The motion passed with a vote of 4 to 1, with one member opposing the decision.

The meeting concluded with a call for public comments, but no additional issues were raised by attendees. The Board then adjourned, marking the end of a session focused on community development and resident concerns.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Michigan articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI