City ordinance sparks debate over rental registry requirements

During a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed ordinance related to local property management and tenant registration. The ordinance aims to collect contact information for local property owners, specifically requiring only names and phone numbers, which proponents argue is distinct from the broader data requested by the existing lead registry.

Supporters of the ordinance, including a council member, emphasized its potential to foster better communication and support between local developers, tenants, and landlords. They believe this initiative could enhance community engagement and improve the management of rental properties.

However, opposition emerged from property owner Steven Lewenstein, who argued that the ordinance duplicates existing statewide registry requirements established under Rhode Island statute 34-18-58. He expressed concerns about the additional administrative burden it would impose on property owners, suggesting that it could lead to unnecessary costs and complications. Lewenstein also raised legal concerns, questioning the constitutionality of hefty fines for non-compliance and the implications of making property owners' personal information public.

The meeting highlighted a divide between those advocating for enhanced local oversight of rental properties and those cautioning against potential redundancies and legal issues. As the council continues to deliberate on the ordinance, the discussions reflect broader themes of property management, tenant rights, and community relations in the region.