During a recent city council meeting, a heated discussion emerged regarding the selection of a contractor for a local project, highlighting concerns over transparency and local business support. One council member passionately criticized the decision to consider an out-of-state contractor, emphasizing the importance of hiring local talent.

The council member pointed out that the contractor in question has a history of flipping houses and questioned the council's preference for external businesses over local ones. \"This man and his family are well-known business people,\" the member stated, arguing that it is against the city's best interest to overlook local options, especially when they could potentially offer better financial terms.

Concerns were raised about the lack of written commitments from the out-of-state contractor regarding the project's timeline, drawing parallels to previous projects that stalled, such as the 5th Third Bank. The council member expressed skepticism about the contractor's reliability and questioned the rationale behind accepting a $30,000 payment from them, suggesting it could be perceived as a bribe.

The meeting concluded without further comments from the council, leaving the community to ponder the implications of prioritizing external contractors over local businesses and the transparency of the council's decision-making process.