During a recent government meeting, discussions centered on the fitness of political candidates, particularly regarding age and health. A participant expressed concerns about the current pool of presidential candidates, suggesting that many are \"getting old\" and that voters desire leaders who are \"healthy\" and capable of responding to a rapidly changing world.

The conversation highlighted a growing sentiment among constituents that age should be a factor in determining eligibility for public office. One recommendation proposed was to impose a maximum age limit of 70 for individuals seeking to serve as judges or elected officials. This suggestion stems from the belief that cognitive and physical capabilities may decline with age, particularly after 80.

To address these concerns, an alternative approach was also discussed: implementing annual medical and cognitive assessments for candidates. This would ensure that those seeking office are adequately prepared for the demands of leadership. If candidates fail to meet the required standards, they would be barred from taking office.

The dialogue reflects a broader societal debate about the qualifications and health of political leaders, emphasizing the importance of vibrant and capable representation in government.