In a recent government meeting, discussions highlighted significant concerns regarding the financial stability of property insurers backing mortgages, particularly in Florida. Mortgage lenders mandate property insurance, and government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) like Fannie Mae only purchase mortgages from insurers that meet specific financial strength ratings. Currently, the GSEs recognize three main rating agencies: AM Best, S&P, and Demotech. For instance, Fannie Mae requires insurers to hold at least a B rating from AM Best or an A rating from Demotech.

Despite these requirements, a troubling trend has emerged: a notable increase in mortgages backed by insurers deemed financially fragile. Research indicates that the GSEs, and by extension taxpayers, may bear a significant financial burden due to this situation. The analysis focuses on Florida, where traditional insurers are withdrawing from the market, leaving a void increasingly filled by lower-rated insurers, particularly those rated by Demotech, which now commands approximately 60% of the market share in the state.

These insurers, while meeting the GSEs' minimum rating criteria, exhibit poor financial and operational metrics, raising concerns about their long-term viability. Alarmingly, many of these insurers would not qualify under the standards of other rating agencies, suggesting that their ratings may be inflated. This misalignment raises questions about the adequacy of the GSEs' insurer requirements and the potential risks posed to the mortgage market by these fragile insurers. The meeting underscored the urgent need for a reassessment of the rating criteria to safeguard the financial integrity of the mortgage system.