During a recent government meeting, council members expressed significant concerns regarding the terms of a property sale agreement with a developer, Doctor Horton. The discussions highlighted issues surrounding the timeline and conditions of the bid process, which some council members deemed unacceptable for taxpayers.

One council member pointed out that the agreement allowed for 210 days without a guarantee of closure, placing the financial burden on taxpayers. They emphasized that the original request for bids stipulated a 30-day period to enter into a purchase and sale agreement, a timeline that was not adhered to by the developer. The council member noted that the agreement was signed over a year later than expected, raising questions about the legitimacy of the process.

Another council member echoed these sentiments, suggesting that the city should either enforce the original terms of the bid or consider reopening the bidding process to ensure a better deal for taxpayers. They acknowledged the complexities involved in property transactions, particularly in residential construction, but insisted that the city must hold developers accountable to the agreed-upon timelines.

The meeting also revealed that the last appraisal of the property was conducted four years ago, with the most recent valuation coming in significantly higher than the initial bid. The developer's proposal was based on outdated appraisal data, which raised further concerns about the fairness of the offer.

Overall, the council's discussions underscored a commitment to transparency and accountability in property dealings, with members advocating for a thorough review of the terms to protect taxpayer interests.