In a recent committee of the whole meeting, city council members engaged in a detailed discussion regarding the procedural aspects of a developer's agreement. The meeting, which was called to address this specific agenda item, highlighted the council's interpretation of local ordinances governing the review process for development matters.

The council's deliberations centered on whether the developer's agreement needed to be presented at a prior committee meeting before moving to a council vote. Some members expressed concerns about the timing and adherence to the ordinance, which stipulates that all matters must first be reviewed by the committee of the whole. However, it was clarified that the ordinance does not explicitly define \"all matters,\" allowing for flexibility in the process.

The discussion also touched on the specifics of the development project, including the preliminary and final plat approvals, which will follow the standard review process by the plan commission and the council. The city engineer will oversee project plans, while other aspects such as covenants and restrictions will be reviewed by the city attorney.

Council members also inquired about the developer's plans for the empty lots, with indications that the focus would initially be on constructing an apartment building alongside six homes, with potential for additional sales to other developers.

Despite some dissent regarding the procedural approach, the majority of council members ultimately agreed to move the developer's agreement forward for a vote at the next council meeting, reflecting a commitment to advancing the project while navigating the complexities of local governance.