In a recent government meeting, significant discussions emerged regarding the validity of signatures collected for a petition, particularly focusing on allegations of forgery by certain circulators. Concerns were raised about the integrity of the signature verification process, with officials questioning whether the circulators in question had indeed signed the petitions they were associated with.

One participant emphasized the importance of examining the circulators rather than solely focusing on the number of signatures, indicating a desire to ensure that the process is transparent and accountable. The discussion highlighted the potential impact of invalidating signatures, with one speaker noting that 641 signatures could be deemed invalid if the allegations of forgery are substantiated. This number far exceeds the threshold needed to disqualify the petition.

The meeting also revealed that a list of the alleged forgers had been submitted over a month ago, yet no action had been taken to verify the signatures against those on the petitions. A call was made for the West campaign to provide signature samples for comparison, underscoring the urgency of addressing these allegations before the upcoming deadline.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the integrity of the petition process is under scrutiny, with officials urging prompt action to resolve the challenges posed by the circulators' alleged misconduct. The outcome of this investigation could have significant implications for the petition's validity and the broader electoral process.