During a recent government meeting, concerns regarding transparency and communication in the candidate selection process were prominently discussed. A council member expressed frustration over the perceived lack of clarity in the process, emphasizing the importance of trust in city management. They highlighted that while they value the hard work of their colleagues, the procedures must be transparent and fair to foster confidence among council members.

In response, officials outlined the steps taken to ensure transparency, including meetings with individual council members, a proposed timeline for the search, and regular updates on application numbers. They noted that the selection process involved presenting a semi-final report with 14 candidates, four of whom were internal. However, the council member countered that the process felt opaque, citing a non-binding survey that was presented as a conversation starter without adequate opportunity for meaningful input.

Another representative raised similar concerns, pointing out that appointed panel members were left without essential information about meeting logistics and the selection process. They stressed the need for timely communication to ensure that committee members could fulfill their obligations and participate effectively.

The discussions underscored a critical need for improved communication and engagement strategies within the council to enhance transparency and trust in the decision-making process.