During a recent school board meeting, members engaged in a heated discussion regarding the timing of future meetings, highlighting the impact on student participation and community engagement. The debate centered around whether to hold meetings at 6 PM or 7 PM, with board member Mackenzie Boucher expressing concerns that later meetings would hinder student attendance, particularly for high school scholars who start their day early. She emphasized the importance of accommodating students' schedules, noting that many wake up as early as 4:30 AM.

Board member Mister Duray countered that the 7 PM start time was more convenient for many community members, allowing them to attend after completing their daily responsibilities. He acknowledged the need to consider the diverse needs of families, particularly those with young children, and argued that the decision to shift the meeting time should reflect the community's preferences rather than individual convenience.

Victoria Boucher, another board member, pointed out that she had adjusted her work schedule to accommodate the 6 PM meetings and expressed frustration over the lack of consensus on the timing. She noted that many community members had voiced a preference for the later start time, which allowed them to participate more easily.

The discussion culminated in a proposal for a compromise, suggesting a 6:30 PM start time for future meetings. This proposal aimed to balance the needs of students, parents, and community members while allowing for further evaluation of the meeting times' effectiveness.

The board ultimately moved on to other agenda items, including human resources matters, but the conversation about meeting times underscored the ongoing challenge of balancing accessibility and participation in school governance.