In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the challenges of implementing PFAS filtration systems in local schools, highlighting significant discrepancies in cost and concerns over maintenance and health risks. The discussion was led by a representative who acknowledged the efforts of team members Jen, Brent Anderson, and Denise Jorgensen in researching filtration options.

The representative presented two quotes for granular activated carbon systems: one from Wigan Water Technologies for $285,000, which does not include installation, and another from Crystal Quest for $49,320, which also excludes installation costs. The stark difference in pricing raised concerns about the reliability and comprehensiveness of the proposals.

The representative emphasized that filtering PFAS in a multi-building school setting is uncommon, complicating the search for effective solutions. They noted that while the district has successfully filtered its drinking water sources, ongoing maintenance of any new system poses potential health risks, including the risk of Legionnaires disease if not properly managed.

Director Susan raised questions about the separation of potable water sources within the school, clarifying that all water enters from a single city source. This led to discussions about potential cost savings from previous infrastructure changes made to address lead contamination.

Concerns were also voiced regarding the timing of the city's permanent solution to PFAS contamination, with some officials hesitant to invest heavily in temporary fixes when a long-term resolution may be forthcoming. The meeting concluded with a call for further investigation into the health risks associated with current water usage and a request for feedback on whether to continue exploring filtration options or to revisit the issue in the future.