During a recent government meeting, the policy committee discussed significant revisions to guidance regarding the handling of student gender identity information and the rights of student journalists.

The committee introduced new language that limits the use of surveys and questionnaires when staff seek information about a student's gender identity. This change aims to protect students' rights to share such information voluntarily, without imposing restrictions on their ability to do so. The revised guidance is set for a first reading at the meeting, following discussions from an earlier session on August 19.

Director Audette raised concerns about the use of vague language in the policy, noting that terms like \"should\" and \"strive\" could lead to ambiguity compared to more definitive terms like \"must.\" The committee acknowledged the need for clarity and agreed to consider adjustments to ensure that the language reflects a stronger directive where necessary.

In addition, the committee reviewed a new policy for school-sponsored media, prompted by recent legislative changes that enhance protections for student journalists. The proposed revisions include definitions for key terms such as \"student journalists\" and outline the rights of these students, ensuring they are not subject to discipline for exercising their rights under the new statute. The policy also specifies circumstances under which school administration can limit student expression, such as obscenity or defamation, aligning with existing legal standards.

Concerns were raised about the removal of specific terms like \"libelous\" and \"slanderous,\" with committee members seeking clarification on the rationale behind these changes. The committee explained that the term \"defamation\" encompasses both libel and slander, thus maintaining legal protections.

The meeting concluded with a commitment to refine the policies further, ensuring they provide clear guidance for staff and protect the rights of students. The next steps involve gathering feedback from the community and stakeholders to enhance clarity and effectiveness in the implementation of these policies.