In a recent government meeting, city officials outlined the process for selecting a new city administrator, emphasizing a timeline aimed at naming a finalist between October 21 and 24. The mayor and city council will conduct final interviews, after which they will negotiate contracts with the chosen candidate. However, the decision-making process has sparked concerns among community members regarding transparency and inclusivity.

Several attendees voiced their dissatisfaction with the current selection process, which excludes community members from voting on candidates. One resident expressed a desire for a more transparent approach, similar to past superintendent searches that included broader community representation. This sentiment was echoed by another participant who highlighted the importance of involving not just department heads but also staff members and local business owners in the discussion.

Concerns were raised about the adequacy of outreach to the community regarding the meeting and the selection process. A former councilor pointed out that while information was posted on the city website, it lacked visibility on social media platforms, which many residents rely on for news. This has led to fears that not enough stakeholders are aware of the opportunity to provide input on the qualities they seek in a new city administrator.

Participants emphasized the need for a candidate who is approachable, trustworthy, and capable of fostering economic development without relying solely on federal grants. The discussions underscored a collective desire for a leader who can engage with the community and address pressing issues, particularly those affecting vulnerable populations such as seniors.

As the selection process moves forward, city officials are encouraged to consider the feedback from community members to ensure that the new city administrator aligns with the needs and expectations of the residents they will serve.