During a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding a proposed market rate housing agreement associated with the Saratoga Retirement Community (SRC). Critics, including K. CK Chan, argued that the agreement is illegal on two primary grounds. Firstly, it allegedly imposes rent controls that violate health and safety codes applicable to licensed residential care facilities for the elderly. Chan emphasized that such facilities, including SRC, cannot be subjected to below-market rate rents, asserting that any enforcement of the agreement would constitute illegal rent control.

Secondly, Chan criticized the financial implications of the agreement, claiming it unfairly burdens SRC residents and others in Napa—who are outside the city’s jurisdiction—by imposing what he termed an \"illegal tax.\" He argued that the financial structure of the Odd Fellows Home of California, which operates both SRC and a facility in Napa, means that any financial strain on one facility impacts the other. Chan concluded by urging the council to reject the application, citing the lack of a general public benefit.

In a show of community opposition, Chan also reported on a citywide petition drive that garnered 264 signatures from Saratoga residents, including homeowners and SRC residents, opposing the expansion proposal. Concerns raised by local residents included potential disruptions from construction noise, as highlighted in letters from community members like Gloria Bartra and James Bernd.

The discussions reflect a growing tension between community interests and proposed developments, as residents seek to protect their quality of life while navigating the complexities of local governance and housing regulations.