During a recent government meeting, residents of the Saratoga Retirement Community (SRC) voiced their concerns regarding a proposed expansion plan by the out-of-state developer PRS. The discussions highlighted a clash between property rights and the rights of elderly residents, many of whom are in their mid-80s and fear the impact of construction on their quality of life.

K. Michael, one of the speakers, urged the council to negotiate a balanced plan that addresses both the city's housing needs and the residents' well-being. He emphasized the importance of protecting the rights of seniors, suggesting that the council has the authority to redirect the proposal to ensure a fair compromise that benefits all parties involved.

Marilyn, another resident, clarified that the residents had proposed an alternative plan for a single apartment building, rather than a healthcare center, which would not impose the same burdens on the community. She stressed that the SRC residents are integral members of Saratoga, contributing to local schools and businesses, and should not bear the brunt of the development's impact.

Betsy expressed frustration over the planning commission's all-or-nothing stance on the PRS proposal, which she felt disregarded the residents' needs. She urged the council to consider the human impact of the construction, which could lead to years of disruption for the elderly residents.

Don Schmedek highlighted the severe consequences of the proposed construction, including noise, dust, and limited access to essential services. He called for a human impact report to assess the potential hazards posed to the residents during the construction period.

Patricia Thomas, a newer resident, shared her emotional connection to the SRC's natural beauty and urged the council to reject the current expansion plan in favor of one that preserves the community's character.

Tony Vandersteen echoed the sentiment of seeking a compromise, advocating for a more modest expansion that would not compromise the environment or the residents' quality of life. He expressed concern over the long-term disruption that could last several years.

Chuck Cummins concluded the public comments by stating his support for affordable housing but opposed placing the financial burden solely on the elderly residents of SRC.

The meeting underscored the residents' desire for a collaborative approach to development that respects their rights and needs while addressing the city's housing requirements. The council's decision on the proposed expansion remains pending, with residents hopeful for a more equitable solution.