In a recent city council meeting, discussions centered around the proposed expansion of the Saratoga Retirement Community (SRC), highlighting both community support and opposition. The meeting featured multiple speakers, including residents and representatives from local organizations, who expressed their views on the project.
John B. Henley Jr., a resident of Fellowship Plaza, raised concerns about discrepancies in parking unit numbers related to the expansion, citing a letter from Sarah Stell, the executive director of the Saratoga Retirement Community. He emphasized that a significant portion of current residents—38%—were unaware of the expansion plans, which he believes contributes to the pushback from the community. Henley urged the council to postpone any voting on the project to allow for further discussion and compromise.
Eli Robles, representing Local 405 in San Jose, voiced support for the project but stressed the importance of ensuring fair wages and working conditions for construction workers involved. He called for collaboration with a responsible contractor to ensure the project benefits both the community and its workforce.
Tony Delgado, a board member of the SRC, defended the need for expansion, stating that the facility has evolved since its establishment in 1912 to meet the changing needs of retirees. He noted that the proposed addition of 52 units is less than previously authorized and is essential for the community's future.
David Fleck, also an Odd Fellow, echoed Delgado's sentiments, emphasizing the importance of planning for future residents while managing current community concerns. He urged the council to trust the developers, citing their past successes in enhancing the community.
Aaron Farrell, the sales director of SRC, affirmed that transparency has been a priority in communicating the expansion plans to prospective residents. He reported a growing waitlist for the community, indicating strong demand for the facility.
The meeting concluded with a call for careful consideration of the expansion's long-term benefits, balancing the immediate concerns of current residents with the needs of future generations. The council is expected to deliberate on the project in the coming days, weighing the diverse perspectives presented during the meeting.