In a recent government meeting, community members expressed strong opposition to a proposed development of 339 residential lots in an unzoned area, raising concerns about environmental impact, infrastructure strain, and community safety. The developer's plan, which includes a mix of 60-foot and 70-foot lots, has sparked significant debate among local residents who fear the high density will disrupt the rural character of the area.

Residents voiced worries about potential flooding, increased traffic, and the strain on local services, particularly the volunteer fire department. Concerns were also raised regarding the impact on local wildlife, with one resident highlighting the presence of endangered species in the vicinity. Several speakers emphasized the need for thorough environmental studies and traffic assessments before proceeding with the development.

Kimberly Steele, a local resident, criticized the lack of comprehensive studies on how the development would affect waterways and wildlife habitats. She urged the planning board to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Services to ensure compliance with environmental regulations. Other residents echoed her sentiments, stressing that the area is already prone to flooding and that additional homes would exacerbate existing drainage issues.

The meeting also highlighted the community's frustration with the planning process, as many residents felt they were not adequately informed about the development plans. Joseph Dean, a retired police detective, warned that the increased population density could lead to higher crime rates and traffic congestion, further straining local resources.

Despite the concerns raised, the planning board noted that the developer is following the necessary regulations and that their hands are somewhat tied due to the lack of zoning in the area. The board emphasized that any approval would require the developer to conduct traffic and drainage studies to mitigate potential issues.

As the meeting concluded, community members were left with lingering concerns about the future of their neighborhood and the implications of such a large-scale development in a predominantly rural area. The planning board's next steps will be crucial in addressing these issues and determining the fate of the proposed subdivision.