Residents of St. Tammany Parish voiced strong concerns during a recent government meeting regarding proposed commercial development in flood-prone areas. Local property owners highlighted the risks associated with increasing development intensity in regions already vulnerable to flooding, citing personal experiences and historical data.
One resident, who has lived in the area for decades, emphasized that their property can withstand only a limited amount of rainfall before flooding occurs. They noted that significant rainfall events, often exceeding 15 inches, have led to their property being submerged multiple times over the past 40 years. The resident criticized the notion of placing highway commercial developments in flood zones, arguing that such decisions would exacerbate flooding risks and lead to increased calls for emergency responses.
The discussion also referenced a feasibility study conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers, which concluded that proposed river modifications and diversion canals would not significantly alleviate flooding issues. The resident pointed out that the area's average annual rainfall of 60 inches, combined with the historical frequency of severe floods, makes the proposed developments particularly ill-advised.
Concerns were raised about the potential economic implications of such developments, including the financial burden of flood mitigation efforts and increased flood insurance rates. The parish council is currently engaged in a lawsuit against FEMA over rising flood insurance costs, which some residents argue is a direct consequence of overdevelopment in flood-prone areas.
Another speaker, Patricia Swindler, shared her experience of relocating to Covington after Hurricane Katrina, warning that changes in community infrastructure can have unintended consequences, including increased traffic and safety risks. She recounted the tragic loss of young lives in traffic accidents in the area, linking these incidents to the anticipated rise in traffic from new commercial developments.
Overall, the meeting underscored a growing apprehension among residents about the implications of intensifying development in flood zones, with calls for more sustainable planning that prioritizes community safety and environmental preservation.