In a recent government meeting, a contentious debate unfolded regarding the application for a new liquor store in Spring Valley, with local business owners expressing strong opposition based on proximity and potential economic impact.

Robert Romano, representing the owner of the closest liquor store, raised concerns about the proposed store's location, which he argued is only 812 feet away from his establishment. He emphasized that such a close distance in a less densely populated area like Spring Valley could significantly harm existing businesses, particularly as sales at nearby stores are already declining. Romano pointed out that two previous applications for liquor stores in the area were denied due to similar concerns about proximity and market saturation.

Vikash Shah, the principal of the closest store, echoed these sentiments, stating that the new store's opening could jeopardize his business and lead to layoffs among his employees. He argued that the local market is not equipped to support another liquor store so close to existing ones, suggesting that the approval of this application would set a troubling precedent.

In contrast, Brian Hahneman, representing the applicant, defended the proposal by asserting that the area is rapidly growing and can sustain additional liquor stores. He contested Romano's claims about declining sales, arguing that the figures presented were incomplete and did not account for the peak sales months of November and December. Hahneman also noted that the proposed store would not create a monopoly, as it would replace an existing location that had recently changed ownership.

The discussion highlighted the tension between local business interests and the potential for new market entrants in a growing community. As the board weighs the application, the outcome could have significant implications for the local economy and the future of liquor retail in Spring Valley.