During a recent government meeting, a resident of Aspen, Colorado, raised critical concerns regarding the future of transportation infrastructure in the area, specifically addressing the implications of a proposed three-lane bridge project. The resident emphasized that any new Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or amendments must align with the objectives established in the 1998 preferred alternative record of decisions, unless there are significant changes to those objectives.

A key point of discussion was the workforce demographics, with over 70% of Aspen's workforce reportedly residing across Castle Creek. This statistic underscores the importance of community-based planning and inclusive processes, which the resident argued have been overlooked, as local engineers and traffic managers have not been included in discussions led by the Jacobs Group, the firm responsible for engineering aspects of the project.

The resident highlighted safety concerns, particularly regarding pedestrian safety and accident rates in the area, which the proposed three-lane bridge does not adequately address. They pointed out that the current design would necessitate additional infrastructure, such as a bus slip lane, which would disrupt public spaces, including Bugsy Barnard Park and the local golf course.

Financial constraints were also a concern, with the resident noting that funding from the infrastructure and jobs Biden bill may be depleted by the time a new EIS is finalized. They stressed the importance of adhering to new federal greenhouse gas emission standards, which would limit reliance on fossil fuels and single-occupant vehicles.

Emergency access was another critical issue raised, particularly in light of wildfire evacuation scenarios. The resident expressed alarm at the estimated 15-hour evacuation time for Aspen, questioning whether this plan adequately considers residents living further up Independence Pass.

The resident concluded by urging county officials to take a definitive stance on the project, especially as a ballot question regarding the bridge may soon be presented to voters. They called for clarity on the county's values and future goals, particularly concerning the use of local properties and transit options.