In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the future of the Aspen-Pitkin County Airport, particularly in light of proposed changes to the Home Rule Charter that would limit the Board of County Commissioners' authority over runway expansions or relocations without voter approval.

The meeting highlighted concerns about the potential reduction of air service to Aspen, with only one regional jet still operating to Gunnison, while other routes have transitioned to larger aircraft. This shift raises questions about the airport's capacity to accommodate future air travel needs, especially as the efficiency of aircraft continues to improve.

John Ned Walker, a long-time resident and former airline executive, expressed strong support for the county's plans to enhance airport safety and operations, emphasizing the importance of maintaining federal funding and the need for modernization. He urged the community to consider the implications of losing federal support, framing the proposed changes as essential for safety rather than expansion.

Evan Marks, another community member, criticized the opposition to the airport's proposed changes, describing it as a campaign of misinformation. He commended the county staff and board for their efforts to modernize the airport while minimizing taxpayer impact.

The board acknowledged the complexity of the situation, with Patty commenting on the challenges of amending the Home Rule Charter, which serves as the county's constitution. She noted that the authority granted to the board by voters in 1978 should not be undermined by the proposed changes.

As the board moved to place the citizens' initiated amendment on the ballot for the November 2024 election, members reiterated the importance of clear communication with the public regarding the specific limitations being proposed. The meeting concluded with a consensus on the necessity of allowing voters to decide on the future governance of the airport's operations.