In a recent court hearing, discussions centered around the modification of a child custody arrangement, with both parents presenting their cases regarding changes in work schedules and their impacts on the child. The petitioner argued for a week-to-week custody schedule, citing a change in his work hours that required him to wake the child early for school. He claimed that despite the early wake-up time, the child was able to rest adequately during the day.

The opposing party, represented by Ms. Gadd, highlighted her own demanding work schedule, which includes early morning shifts and overtime, raising questions about her availability for childcare. The court noted that Ms. Gadd had not provided sufficient evidence of her income, which is crucial for determining child support obligations. The petitioner’s attorney suggested that the court could impute income to Ms. Gadd based on standard guidelines, given her lack of documentation.

Throughout the proceedings, the judge expressed concerns about the potential disruption to the child’s routine, particularly the implications of waking the child at 4:30 AM. The judge indicated that while there was a material change in circumstances, it did not warrant a complete overhaul of the existing custody arrangement. Instead, the judge leaned towards maintaining a schedule that would minimize disruption, suggesting extended weekends for the petitioner rather than a week-to-week arrangement.

The court is expected to review the evidence presented and issue a ruling on the custody modification in the coming days. The case underscores the complexities of balancing parental work commitments with the best interests of the child, as both parties seek to establish a stable and supportive environment.