During a recent Santa Cruz city council meeting, local real estate broker Annina Van Alstyne expressed her deep concerns regarding the city's planning and development strategies, particularly in light of California's Senate Bill 9 (SB 9). Van Alstyne, a long-time resident and daughter of a city planner, criticized the council for what she perceives as a failure to adequately address the unique geographic and transportation challenges facing the community.

Van Alstyne argued that the current development plans overlook the reality that many residents commute from outside the area, which she believes will exacerbate traffic issues and undermine the town's appeal. She highlighted the disconnect between the push for affordable housing and the high costs of construction, noting that basic building expenses exceed $600 per square foot, making it nearly impossible to create truly affordable living spaces.

In her passionate plea, she called for the council to challenge the state’s mandates, suggesting that the city needs to take a stand against what she described as poorly planned developments that could permanently alter the character of Santa Cruz. Van Alstyne specifically referenced the ongoing developments around the town clock area, warning that without proper infrastructure, the city could face significant long-term challenges.

The meeting also included procedural matters, such as the approval of minutes from a previous meeting, which passed unanimously. However, the primary focus remained on the urgent need for thoughtful urban planning that considers the community's unique needs and the implications of state legislation.