In a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding a proposed 30-year stadium deal and redevelopment project in St. Petersburg. Community members and council members alike expressed the need for a more deliberate approach to the decision-making process, urging the council to \"pump the brakes\" on the current timeline.

One speaker highlighted a letter signed by multiple organizations, outlining their opposition to the current development agreements for both the stadium and the Gas Plant redevelopment. Key issues included the sale of land, the need for affordable housing, and environmental concerns. The speaker emphasized the importance of addressing lingering community concerns before proceeding with a vote scheduled for July 11.

Kenneth Mack, a resident with deep ties to the Gas Plant District, voiced support for the deal, citing potential benefits for the community. However, he acknowledged the complexities involved and the need for careful consideration.

Pastor Andy Oliver criticized the rushed nature of the proceedings, stating it undermined democratic processes by limiting public feedback. He echoed sentiments from other council members who expressed discomfort with voting on incomplete documents, emphasizing the necessity for transparency and thorough review.

Council member Hanewitz reiterated the importance of having finalized documents before any votes, noting that the current drafts lacked crucial details, including affordable housing commitments and traffic management plans. He and others expressed frustration over the ongoing changes to meeting schedules, which complicate public engagement.

Despite the push for a more measured approach, the council ultimately voted to proceed with setting public hearing dates, passing the motion with a 5-3 vote. Council members Floyd, Hanowitz, and Mohammed voted against the motion, citing concerns over the lack of finalized agreements and the rushed timeline.

As the council prepares for the upcoming hearings, the discussions underscore the tension between the urgency of development and the need for community input and thorough legislative oversight.