Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Residents demand affordable housing amid stadium deal controversy

June 13, 2024 | St. Petersburg, Pinellas County, Florida



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Residents demand affordable housing amid stadium deal controversy
During a recent city council meeting in St. Petersburg, residents voiced strong concerns regarding a proposed development deal involving the Tampa Bay Rays and its implications for affordable housing and community welfare.

Carrie Mueller, a member of the advocacy group Dream Defenders, highlighted the urgent need for affordable housing in the city, arguing that the current deal prioritizes real estate developers over the needs of residents. She emphasized that many community members feel unsafe due to rising living costs and lack of housing security. Mueller urged the council to reconsider the deal, stating it does not guarantee affordable housing units and could exacerbate existing segregation issues in St. Petersburg.

Another speaker, Carrie Mueller from Campbell Park, echoed these sentiments, calling for more time to review the development agreement. She pointed out several red flags, including the lack of provisions for disadvantaged workers and businesses in the construction phase, and questioned why the city is shouldering the financial burden of infrastructure costs. She expressed concern that the deal does not adequately address community benefits and urged the council to delay the vote until these issues are resolved.

Rebecca Pinkenberry, a long-time resident and taxpayer, also raised critical questions about the deal, including the valuation of the land, the limited public open space, and the financial responsibilities of the Rays versus the city. She urged the council to ensure that the development aligns with sustainable practices and the city’s commitment to clean energy.

Overall, the meeting underscored a growing tension between community needs and corporate interests, with residents calling for transparency and accountability in the development process. The council faces pressure to address these concerns before moving forward with the deal.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Florida articles free in 2025

Republi.us
Republi.us
Family Scribe
Family Scribe