Community leader demands transparency in city planning process

During a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the lack of communication and transparency surrounding the dredging committee's activities. A committee member expressed frustration over not receiving any phone calls or updates for four years, questioning the direction of the project and the decision-making process that has seemingly occurred without public input.

The member highlighted a specific issue with the city plan, which reportedly does not include a second phase of the dredging project. This revelation raised further questions about the origins of the plan and its implications for the community.

Additionally, the meeting featured Dan Evans, a prominent figure with extensive experience managing large-scale projects, including the strategic oil reserves. His expertise was emphasized as a valuable resource that the board should consider. The committee member urged the board to listen to Evans, suggesting that his insights could significantly benefit the project, despite potential higher costs compared to hiring a traditional engineer.

The meeting concluded without further comments from attendees, leaving the future of the dredging project and community engagement in question.