In a recent government meeting, the Pontiac Charter Revision Commission presented a proposal aimed at updating the city’s charter, which has remained unchanged since 1982. The discussion highlighted significant concerns from community members regarding the lack of public education and transparency surrounding the proposed changes, particularly as ballots have already been distributed.

Pro Tem Carrington initiated the meeting, emphasizing the importance of the charter revision and the need for a comprehensive understanding of its implications. Several community members expressed their dissatisfaction with the process, arguing that the charter revision was rushed and lacked adequate public engagement. Notably, Dr. Digidra Waterman criticized the commission for insufficient outreach, stating that many residents were unaware of the charter's contents before voting.

Billy Schweser, a resident, echoed these sentiments, asserting that the lengthy 48-page document should have been made available earlier to allow for informed voting. She urged her neighbors to scrutinize their ballots and emphasized the importance of civic participation in the electoral process.

Further concerns were raised by Darlene Clark and Gloria Miller, who warned that the proposed charter could grant excessive power to the administration, undermining the authority of the city council and the voice of the citizens. They called for a more deliberate approach to governance, stressing that the charter should reflect the community's needs and values.

In response to the criticisms, the Charter Revision Commission defended their work, highlighting that they had spent over 984 hours drafting the proposal and had engaged with the community throughout the process. They argued that the revisions are necessary to address outdated provisions and improve governmental efficiency.

The meeting concluded with a call for residents to read the proposed charter and participate in the upcoming vote, underscoring the critical nature of this decision for the future governance of Pontiac. As the community grapples with these proposed changes, the outcome of the charter vote remains uncertain, with strong opinions on both sides of the debate.