During a recent Iroquois County Board meeting, discussions centered around a proposed non-binding referendum aimed at exploring the possibility of separating from Cook County to form a new state. The meeting began with the approval of previous minutes and payroll, followed by public comments that highlighted growing concerns among residents regarding state governance.

Julie J., a local resident, expressed her worries about recent laws passed by representatives from the Chicago area, particularly criticizing the Safety Act and its implications for crime prosecution and funding for pensions. She voiced her desire for a future where her family could thrive without the burdens imposed by these laws.

Laurette Newland, a coordinator for the Illinois separation movement, elaborated on the referendum's purpose, which seeks to gauge public sentiment on the potential separation from Cook County. She emphasized that the referendum would allow citizens to express their views on governance, asserting that many residents feel disconnected from the decisions made by a legislature dominated by Chicago interests.

Newland clarified that the referendum does not automatically initiate separation but serves as a crucial step in assessing community support. She noted the importance of local officials having a voice in discussions about the financial implications of such a move, including the division of debts and pension obligations.

The board was urged to consider the referendum as a means to empower citizens and address grievances stemming from perceived inequities in state governance. Newland reassured board members that there would be no state retaliation for allowing the referendum to proceed, citing constitutional protections.

The meeting underscored a significant local sentiment advocating for greater autonomy and representation, reflecting broader tensions between urban and rural governance in Illinois.