City leaders debate referendum for urgent infrastructure needs

During a recent government meeting, officials discussed the potential for a referendum to address pressing community needs, including infrastructure and public safety projects. The conversation was sparked by the mayor's earlier proposal, which aimed to gauge public priorities and secure funding for essential services such as police and fire stations.

Council members emphasized the importance of investing in the community, particularly in coastal areas where maintaining quality of life and property values is crucial. They noted that while setting aside funds for resiliency is a step forward, it may not be sufficient to meet the extensive demands projected over the next decade.

The council is considering the timing of a referendum, with the next opportunity aligning with a county election in approximately a year and a half. However, a special election could be arranged at an estimated cost of $80,000, which would delay revenue realization from any potential vote.

Discussions also highlighted the distinction between a proposed tax millage increase and a referendum. The millage increase would primarily fund the general operating budget, covering salaries and day-to-day expenses, while a referendum would focus on capital projects. Council members acknowledged the necessity of both funding mechanisms to ensure the city's operational and infrastructural needs are met.

The meeting underscored the council's commitment to exploring various funding avenues to support the community's growth and resilience, with a clear call for ongoing dialogue about the priorities that should be presented to voters in the near future.