In a recent village council meeting, members discussed the urgent need to hire a lobbyist to influence the Miami-Dade County Commission regarding the controversial construction of the 87th Avenue Bridge. The meeting was prompted by a significant public outcry, with residents expressing both support and opposition to the project.

Councilman Cody proposed a motion to allocate up to $25,000 for hiring a lobbyist, which was seconded by Mayor Cunningham for discussion purposes. However, Councilwoman Matson countered with a resolution suggesting a higher budget, referencing previous expenditures on legal services and emphasizing the urgency of the situation as construction equipment was already on-site.

The council members engaged in a robust debate about the necessity and scope of hiring a lobbyist. While some supported the idea of a one-time hire specifically for the bridge issue, others advocated for a more comprehensive approach, proposing an annual contract for lobbying services to address ongoing and future concerns with the county.

Despite the discussions, Matson's amendment to increase the budget and broaden the scope of lobbying efforts did not receive a second, leading the council to revert to Cody's original motion. The council ultimately agreed that while immediate action was necessary, further discussions would be needed to establish a more permanent lobbying strategy in future budget considerations.

The meeting highlighted the council's commitment to addressing community concerns and navigating the complexities of local governance, particularly in light of the ongoing legal challenges related to the bridge construction.