During a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the funding of a conservation restriction for a property that is currently under development consideration. The discussion centered around a $15,000 appraisal for a conservation restriction on a site located at 1062 Edmonds Road, known as Beastly Farms. This property is now the subject of a pre-application for a development project proposing 50 luxury housing units.

One member expressed apprehension about the funding request, questioning whether the appraisal was necessary given that the property is being considered for development. The member highlighted the potential conflict of interest in using public funds for a private development project, especially if the conservation restriction is a requirement of the zoning for the proposed housing.

The member emphasized the need for thorough due diligence before approving such funding, suggesting that future requests for appraisals should be accompanied by detailed written proposals outlining the specifics of the project, including the size of the land to be preserved versus developed. This call for transparency aims to ensure that public resources are not misallocated to private interests without proper justification.

The discussion reflects a growing concern among officials about the implications of funding conservation efforts that may inadvertently support private development projects, underscoring the need for clearer guidelines and accountability in such financial decisions.