In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the proposed Southern Bypass project, revealing significant concerns regarding its feasibility, cost, and environmental impact. A contractor with experience in large infrastructure projects expressed skepticism about the project's financial viability, estimating that construction costs could double due to the need for extensive excavation and specialized equipment. He highlighted the potential for substantial taxpayer burden, suggesting that while the project might have intriguing elements, the financial implications could deter public support.

The meeting also featured a heated debate over the environmental and cultural impacts of the bypass. Several participants raised alarms about the project's potential to disrupt traditional cultural properties, particularly in the Stoney community. One member emphasized that any construction within these areas would constitute a significant impact, contradicting claims that the project would have minimal effects. The discussion underscored the necessity for thorough soil testing and environmental assessments before proceeding.

Furthermore, the feasibility of the bypass was questioned in light of the lengthy federal approval processes, with estimates suggesting that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) could take up to a decade to complete. This raised concerns about the project's timeline and its alignment with community needs, particularly regarding traffic congestion and safety.

As the committee deliberated, it became clear that while some members were open to exploring the bypass further, others were wary of its implications for local residents and the environment. The meeting concluded with a call for more detailed evaluations and a commitment to consider the community's historical and cultural context in future planning efforts.