During a recent government meeting, community members expressed strong opposition to a proposed infrastructure project that includes an 11-lane bridge design. The discussions highlighted a preference for a more modest approach, with several attendees advocating for only two lanes in each direction.

Carol Buckser, a vocal critic of the current proposal, described the 11-lane slab as a \"monstrosity\" and argued that the community does not require such extensive infrastructure. She emphasized the need to preserve local character and property, particularly in areas known for their cultural significance, such as the \"garlic country\" of Hilton Head Island. Buckser raised concerns about the potential impact on local residents and the environment, suggesting that the project would detract from the area's appeal.

The meeting also touched on safety issues, with Buckser questioning the necessity of additional features like bicycle paths and breakout lanes, citing a lack of pedestrian traffic in the area. She expressed frustration over the perceived disregard for community input, urging officials to reconsider the scale of the project.

As the meeting concluded, a vote on the resolution resulted in a tie, with two members in favor and two opposed, indicating ongoing division within the committee regarding the future of the bridge project. The discussions reflect a broader concern about balancing infrastructure development with community needs and preserving local heritage.