During a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed redevelopment deal involving the Tampa Bay Rays and the Hines project in St. Petersburg. Speakers, including representatives from local organizations and concerned citizens, voiced strong opposition to the deal, citing potential violations of federal rights obligations and the historical displacement of Black residents in the Gas Plant District.

Carla Correa, representing the St. Petersburg Tenants Union, highlighted a letter from Faith in Florida and the Southern Poverty Law Center, which argued that the redevelopment plan could perpetuate discrimination against Black residents, violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the Federal Fair Housing Act. Correa emphasized that the deal, which promises only 1,250 affordable housing units, fails to address the racial wealth gap and risks further gentrification.

Pat Fling, speaking on behalf of two organizations, called for a more equitable allocation of public funds for housing, specifically targeting those earning 80% or less of the area median income. Fling also urged the council to ensure that the new stadium meets environmental standards, particularly regarding hurricane preparedness and energy efficiency.

Former public works commissioner Peter Kent warned that the proposed ordinance could lead to significant tax revenue loss for the city, allowing the administration to redirect up to 60% of property taxes from the downtown Community Redevelopment Area to the Rays and Hines project without a public vote. He described this as \"taxation without representation.\"

Ron Diner echoed these sentiments, urging the council to delay any vote until all questions are answered and a thorough appraisal is conducted. He stressed the importance of making informed decisions that reflect the needs of the community.

The discussions reflect a growing tension between development interests and community needs, with many residents advocating for a more transparent and equitable approach to urban redevelopment. The council faces mounting pressure to reconsider the implications of the Rays-Hines deal before moving forward.