During a recent government meeting, several residents voiced concerns regarding city governance, particularly focusing on issues of illegal signage, financial transparency, and homelessness.

One caller raised alarms about marijuana advertisements in the city, claiming they are illegally erected and violate federal law. The caller questioned the limitations on billboard advertising, suggesting that the issue extends beyond billboards to public transportation. They also expressed concerns about revenue contracts linked to property sales, questioning the legality of selling more than ten properties within a year without city council approval, which they argued violates the city charter.

In response, a council member clarified that the council is not operating illegally and emphasized that any agreements made regarding property sales were within their charter-mandated responsibilities. They assured the caller that they would provide any necessary documentation for further clarification.

Another resident, Monique Shelton, highlighted the need for forensic audits in various city departments, citing previous audits that uncovered corruption and mismanagement. She specifically mentioned the need for scrutiny of the Office of the Chief Financial Officer and the Detroit Demolition Department, which she accused of misusing tax bond funds.

Concerns about homelessness were also raised, with a caller questioning the effectiveness of the city's five-year plan to address the issue. They expressed skepticism about the support provided to homeless individuals and called for more substantial opportunities for rehabilitation and employment.

The meeting also featured a caller who reported ongoing issues with garbage collection and alleged misconduct by developers and land bank surveyors, suggesting possible illegal activities. They criticized the council for not adequately addressing these concerns and called for greater accountability.

As the meeting concluded, the council acknowledged the public's comments and encouraged residents to submit further concerns to the clerk's office for the public record. The discussions underscored ongoing tensions between residents and city officials regarding transparency, accountability, and the management of city resources.